|  | <<  
             ^ 
              >> 
            
              | Date: 2000-04-14 
 
 UK: Datenschuetzer verurteilen Ueberwachungsgesetz-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 
 q/depesche 00.4.14/2
 
 
 UK: Datenschuetzer verurteilen Ueberwachungsgesetz
 
 Das bezeichnenderweise mit RIP akronymi/sierte Schnüffelgesetz
 "Regulation of Investigatory Powers" der Labour-Regierung ist von
 Ihrer Majestät offiziellem Datenschutzbeauftragten in Grund & Boden
 gestampft worden.
 
 
 -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 Data protection watchdog slams Snooping Bill The Home Office's
 Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill faced its most damning
 condemnation so far when the UK data protection watchdog
 presented its concerns to the Home Office.
 
 The Data Protection Commission (DPC) - formerly the Data
 Protection Registrar (DPR) - which handles the protection of personal
 data in the UK, voiced a number of reservations about the Bill in a
 response document submitted to the Home Office during the
 standing committee period which ended 6 April. The DPC report
 contains a wide range of objections raised by Elizabeth France,
 commissioner of the DPC.
 
 Francis Aldhouse, deputy commissioner of the DPC, said the
 organisation fears the legislation on encryption could leave individuals
 open to an invasion of privacy.
 
 "If a key is demanded by a law enforcement agency, you might be
 entirely innocent. It might be to do with somebody else's
 communications but you cannot be told that your security has been
 prejudiced and that is a problem from our point of view," he said.
 ...
 He added: "Interception of communications is a breach of the right to
 privacy. It can be justified on special public policy grounds such as
 the right to investigate crime but there have to be some strict criteria
 which must be satisfied."
 ...
 Simon Davies, director general of rights group Privacy International
 UK, welcomed the DPR's position but said it hasn't taken its
 criticism far enough. "I'm disappointed. It would be useful for the
 commissioner - who has a privacy mandate - to have taken a
 stronger view. They've missed a rare opportunity to stop the Bill in its
 tracks," said Davies.
 ....
 In a written response, the Home Office said the RIP Bill is
 "complementary" to the Human Rights Bill. "We are committed to
 making the UK the best and safest place in the world for ecommerce
 to take place... the government fully recognises the value of
 encryption not just to the individual and to the ecommerce revolution,
 but also as a crime prevention tool in itself, for example in preventing
 fraud on the Internet," it stated.
 
 Full Story
 http://www.silicon.com/bin/bladerunner?REQUNIQ=955718613&30REQEVENT=
 
 
 Related
 'Snooping Bill' slammed by Silicon.com viewers'
 http://www.silicon.com/a36839
 'Government accused of 'hopelessly underestimating' RIP costs'
 http://www.silicon.com/a36658
 
 -.-  -.-. --.-
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 edited by Harkank
 published on: 2000-04-14
 comments to office@quintessenz.at
 subscribe Newsletter
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 <<  
                   ^ 
                    >>
 |  |  |  |